|
John Carthy,
Gun Shop Sales Assistant
|
The Plaintiffs state that Defendants violated their rights secured to them under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and to be free from having unreasonable and excessive force inflicted upon them in the course of an arrest.
But this design for the promotion of virtue at the state and local level was nullified by Supreme Court decisions that ignored the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution and used the First and Fourteenth Amendments to prohibit public promotion of religious beliefs.
The Court began using the due process clause of the Fourteenth amendment and of the Fifth Amendment to overturn a series of regulations under the doctrine that government cannot deny a business owner the right of property with legislation passed to restrict the usage of the property.
|
|
Thomas Owens,
Police Officer
|
Applicant was denied her right to effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States by virtue of trial counsel's insistence in requesting the inclusion of a voluntary intoxication jury instruction at the punishment phase of the trial which had the undeniable effect of unconstitutionally preventing the jury from considering mitigating evidence in determining whether to assess the death penalty.
The Court will consider whether prisoners have a right to non-contact visitation protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments, whether the restrictions imposed by the Michigan Department of Corrections were reasonably related to legitimate penological interests, and whether the restrictions constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
The evidence found in the plastic bag in the defendant's jacket was seized in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.
|
|
Bob Greenberg,
Congressional Candidate
|
Mandatory future payment of radioactive waste storage and disposal costs by Maine citizens who did not benefit the nuclear generation of electricity which created these wastes is a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
Employees are relieved of such financial demands by the First and Fourteenth Amendments as articulated in the Foundation-won Supreme Court decisions Abood v.
This is patently impermissible under recent judicial interpretations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments, as are the permit exemptions for institutional or religious or civic organization signage.
|
|
|
